History needs to be re-written

Submitted by Krishna on 12 December 2006 - 4:05am.

History needs to be re-written to inspire youths of this nation
Justice Mohammed Karim Chagla was one of Jinnah's closest associates in the 1920s, being both his private secretary and Secretary of the Muslim League. After Independence, Chagla went on to become chief justice of the Bombay high court and Union education minister, later. While he held the position, he was deeply involved in educational reforms for this country. Mere hunting for a job had become the aim of the education. He was not at all satisfied about standard of students passing out of various Universities. He was deeply concerned about unruly and riotous tendencies of students in general. He also felt that students lacked character, self-respect and discipline. Naturally, he was surprised to see the discipline of Sangh Swayamsevaks.

Once, during a meeting with Shri Golwalkar Guruji, he expressed his curiosity: “The very same students come to Sangh shakhas where they exhibit a totally co-operative, disciplined and controlled behavior. What do you teach them that they totally refrain themselves from any kind of abusive language or vandalism?”

Rather than answering Mr. Chagla directly, Guruji counter-questioned him: “You’ve been to Russia and have interacted with students out there. How did you find the student community out there?”

Mr. Chagla said: “Students out there are very hard-working, passionate about their work and very well-disciplined”.

Then Shri Guruji asked him another question: “You would have also met Russia’s leaders and Educationists. What do they advise their students?”

Mr. Chagla replied: “They inspire their students to excel in their respective fields, which they think to be the only way that can make Russia the world-leader, thereby also spreading socialism. Only when Russian students excel in all fields, make great strides in development, can it be called a success for socialism”.

Now, Shri Guruji elaborated: “Russian leaders have set objectives for their students. Only when a person finds mission for his life, an objective for his living, can he discipline himself. RSS has set a mission for Swayamsevaks, ‘Param vaibhavam netum etat swa-rashtram’ and that’s what drives them to be disciplined”.

Mr. Chagla replied: “Why can’t our Union government set such mission/objectives for students of the this entire country?”

Shri Guruji replied: “Why not? Government can certainly set such objectives. But the Government won’t be able to inspire students to work towards those objectives. Bharat has guided the world for 30 centuries and was leader in every field, which we call as Hindu Period of our history. Such an inspiring period is given mere 25 pages of history book, whereas 500 pages are devoted to the history of Muslim and British slavery. How can such history be inspiring to students?”

Moreover he said: “History needs to be written differently to make it appealing to students. What did Clive’s uncle do for living, which family did Cornwallis come from or how many Muslim emperors or Nawabs ruled India, such information is hardly of any consequence to us. History has to be a source of inspiration and guidance for generations to come. Can our present-day rulers write such an inspiring history which is the true history? Rather, they fear that it will be labeled history of Hindu Nation”.

Thus, Shri Guruji explained him as to how lack of knowledge of the true history of our country was the main reason for the lack of idealism and direction, resulting in rank selfishness and indiscipline. Proper teaching of history can certainly promote patriotism and raise the spirit of self-sacrifice for might and glory of this nation.

At the end of the meeting, Mr. Chagla was in agreement with Shri Guruji. He was convinced that only such history, as envisaged by Shri Guruji, could be a source of inspiration for Indian students.

Although, times and references have changed, Shri Guruji’s observations about state of history taught in schools in India, and hence quality of students, continues to be the same. In another occasion, Shri Guruji observed: “Our history books tend to revolve round Delhi. But Delhi is not India. And in many periods of Indian history, other kingdoms have been bigger than the kingdom of Delhi. Because of these lopsided history books, our people know little about the Cholas, the Cheras, the Pandyas, the Hoysalas, and the Pulakeshins. How many people have even heard of Kharvel of Utkal, one of the greatest kings of Bharat Varsha, who controlled much of South East Asia? Or of Lachit Barphukan, hero of the successful Assamese resistance of Mughal attacks?”

We think that history books need to be re-written to reflect the true history and such a history would certainly go a long way in inspiring youths of this nation to work for the development of this country.

Anonymous (not verified) on 12 December 2006 - 4:12am

History should not be re-written. Focus on new development rather.

Anonymous (not verified) on 12 December 2006 - 4:15am

Why not, historians have done no justice to Hindu history. What we read today was written by Muslim rulers and then British.

Anonymous (not verified) on 12 December 2006 - 10:09pm

History written by western writers had many inaccuracies, for example MaxMuller who wrote Aryans came to India from other places.

Sudha (not verified) on 17 January 2007 - 8:37am

My dear Krishna,

You took words out of my mouth. I am breathless. The need in yur headline needs to be fair and just. Therefore, I used should. Make it obligatory, mandated, make it compulsory not necessary, which is the connotation in the word you used, "NEED."

Shree Guruji, 'may lord God rest his soul in peace,' (M.L.G.R.H.S.I.P) had answers to all the questions. Mr. Chhagla, a noble man if you can find one who just happens to be a Muslim, need not have asked this simple question to Shree Guruji, MLGRHSIP, The history is simply replete with examples of organization driving the engine of disciplined soldiers parading to the drums of Dictators, Russia was a certified dictatorship, if not India.

History shows examples after silly examples, ample of them in the histories, let us make "Hindu History," Muslim History," British History," Aryan History," Kushan History," Afghan History," Iranian History," Adi Manav of India History," the pesky, petulence of hungry, angry and restless bunch who like to demand reservations and other "Goodies," enjoyrd by the other lowly creatures, all certified citizens of this Grea moterland of ours, OB, OBC, BC, ST, SC, God almighty, save my soul, as I just spilled the beans. I admitted their lowly existence to the high and mighty who are worried about Muslim and British history.

Forgive me, brother, Krishna, Your personal history is full of "Cow Dung."

Come and talk to me.

Sudha

SSCD2007 (not verified) on 17 January 2007 - 6:05pm

The question is not which flavour of history you present/teach, question is what's the objective of the presentation.

I always feel proud of Shivaji Maharaj and Maharashtra because it's history that i was taught in the school is inspiring and that's because it's a history of success. A history of success always makes you feel proud of where you belong to. It make you belong to that identity, own that identity.

And if all i'm taught is, my nation was ruled by invaders for last 700 years, why would i feel proud of it? It's not at all inspiring.

The history, as taught to me in high-school/college, doesn't teach what all strides my ancestors made before that era, in all walks of human life, be it science, astronomy, arts or literature. It doesn't talk about how indian culture made great strides in south-east asia.